Skip to main content

About your Search

20100919
20100919
STATION
CSPAN 1
LANGUAGE
Search Results 0 to 0 of about 1
CSPAN
Sep 19, 2010 10:30am EDT
. they added those two in and canada against him. i can tell you in our visit to the beef connection. we were able to confirm that he is not the only person in louisiana who great -- who drinks that brand of vodka. the key fact that they rely on is a notation that someone at this table had two absoluts. they submitted that to use the they could throw it in the next for a refusal of a federal judge. -- recusal. the house suggests that such meals were intended to influence him and get him to help with bonds. they would get bonds. now they concede that he never set them too high or too low. they did not cite any bonds that were invalid. this guy did not even deserve one. after our deposition, the house had to concede this point. you will hear from both of them that they did not believe judge porteous was influenced by neil's or gifts in the bonds. there was an of beef for bonds. they have both testified that the judge regularly it rejected bond fund them and could not be bought. he will hear from the criminal court, mr. griffin, that he said any representation made by then the check out with the
Search Results 0 to 0 of about 1